Re: Congressional Resolution
By: Bogomips to Dumas Walker on Tue Mar 11 2025 11:46 am

Re: Congressional Resolution
By: Dumas Walker to MATTHEW MUNSON on Sun Mar 09 2025 09:00 am

I thought he was being sarcastic about renaming the Gulf of Mexico, too, and yet here we are.

It should be named Gulf of No-one on the Epstein list has been arrested yet.

well you cant really arrest someone for being on a list, can you.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Congressional Resolution
By: MRO to Mickey on Tue Mar 11 2025 06:59:42

By: Mickey to MRO on Sun Mar 09 2025 08:48 pm

Canada literally stinks of Liberalism (Democrat). I on the other hand would probably

Another thing i find strange is why is canada supplying power to the usa in some
states. especially when i know for sure there are nuclear power plants in most of
those areas that can provide power. It's time to end that, too.

Ya well I think Canada has just added a 25% tarrif to power as well.
Better get the motor runnin'

Mick Manning
..........
Central Ontario Remote Synchro
centralontarioremote.net:2323
<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>

---
þ Synchronet þ Lok your well-being - Join HealthNET

Re: Congressional Resolution
By: Mickey to MRO on Tue Mar 11 2025 07:51 pm

Canada literally stinks of Liberalism (Democrat). I on the other hand would probably

Another thing i find strange is why is canada supplying power to the usa in some
states. especially when i know for sure there are nuclear power plants in most of
those areas that can provide power. It's time to end that, too.

Ya well I think Canada has just added a 25% tarrif to power as well.
Better get the motor runnin'

Mick Manning
..........
Central Ontario Remote Synchro
centralontarioremote.net:2323

yeah that's why i was saying that. tiny told me about it the other day.
well sort of :D
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

But it was stupid, especially since they are supposedly so all about cutting government waste. Changing names of stuff, and being strict about adhearance to the change, is expensive and a waste.

Why do you think it was stupid? There are geographic renamings every day.

There really aren't.

How is it expensive and a waste? Wow much did it hurt the american people? honestly is it any different than declaring it '(subject) day'?

Because they are enforcing strict adhearance, that means someone...
developers, administrative employees, etc... had to go through every bit of code, maps, signs, weather report templates, and anything else with that name and change it.

Everytime we went through an administration change, some dumbass would get
a bee in their bonnet and want to rename a bunck of stuff. We'd estimate
how many (usually millions of) dollars it would cost just to change the
code. If they weren't really a dumbass, they'd freak out and back off.

If they were a dumbass, we'd do the work and spend the money doing something that makes ZERO money for the government, which makes it a WASTE.

I never said declaring something "(subject) day" wasn't also a waste. I am
not that type.


* SLMR 2.1a * Arrogance never wins customers.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Congressional Resolution
By: Dumas Walker to MRO on Wed Mar 12 2025 08:10 am

Why do you think it was stupid? There are geographic renamings every day.

There really aren't.

not that you are aware of. There are streets, rivers, trails, walkways, buildings, cities, and towns that get renamed.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/more-than-600-places-in-the-us-will-remove-racist-slur-from-their-names-180979733/

How is it expensive and a waste? Wow much did it hurt the american people? honestly is it any different than declaring it '(subject) day'?

Because they are enforcing strict adhearance, that means someone... developers, administrative employees, etc... had to go through every bit of code, maps, signs, weather report templates, and anything else with that name and change it.

are you sure about that? is there a law that they have to adhere to the change? do they have to drop what they are doing right now and make the change now, or just do it when there's many more changes due?

If they were a dumbass, we'd do the work and spend the money doing something that makes ZERO money for the government, which makes it a WASTE.

I never said declaring something "(subject) day" wasn't also a waste. I am not that type.

dont worry about this shit dude. we have bigger problems.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Because they are enforcing strict adhearance, that means someone... developers, administrative employees, etc... had to go through every bit

f

code, maps, signs, weather report templates, and anything else with that name and change it.

are you sure about that? is there a law that they have to adhere to the

hange

Trump's press secretary said that all government offices would be adhering
to the change. I am as sure as she is.

do they have to drop what they are doing right now and make the change now,

r

just do it when there's many more changes due?

Per what the press secretary said, it sounded like a drop everything and do
it.


* SLMR 2.1a * Psychics will lead dogs to your body.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Congressional Resolution
By: Dumas Walker to MRO on Thu Mar 13 2025 09:55 am

code, maps, signs, weather report templates, and anything else with that name and change it.

are you sure about that? is there a law that they have to adhere to the

hange

Trump's press secretary said that all government offices would be adhering to the change. I am as sure as she is.

so what do they have to do?
do people even know?

Is it really prudent to think about it right now?

Per what the press secretary said, it sounded like a drop everything and do it.

this is just food for people with tds.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::